jump to navigation

The curious case of the BONUS not a bonus August 24, 2011

Posted by eddiefitz in Bonuses, Carphone Warehouse, Kelvin Close, News, Pay, Preston, Stanford House, Targets, Warrington.
Tags:
add a comment

Apparently a bonus cant be paid on insurance selling or saving a cancellation because of FSA rules. Fair enough so far, (if that is the case), because it is “incentivising.”
BUT when the employee doesn’t save enough insurance cancellations then 10% of the employees overall bonus is affected and can be lost.

But, hang on, IF bonus on selling insurance is banned because it is incentivising, then isn’t NOT Saving insurance also incentivising if it is part of the overall bonus conditions?

If you are affected or can shed light on this curious rule then please get in touch

Advertisements