jump to navigation

The curious case of the BONUS not a bonus August 24, 2011

Posted by eddiefitz in Bonuses, Carphone Warehouse, Kelvin Close, News, Pay, Preston, Stanford House, Targets, Warrington.
Tags:
trackback

Apparently a bonus cant be paid on insurance selling or saving a cancellation because of FSA rules. Fair enough so far, (if that is the case), because it is “incentivising.”
BUT when the employee doesn’t save enough insurance cancellations then 10% of the employees overall bonus is affected and can be lost.

But, hang on, IF bonus on selling insurance is banned because it is incentivising, then isn’t NOT Saving insurance also incentivising if it is part of the overall bonus conditions?

If you are affected or can shed light on this curious rule then please get in touch

Advertisements

Comments»

No comments yet — be the first.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: